A Comparison of SQL Server 2000 with Access 2000
May 14, 2003
Often people in newsgroups ask about some comparison of Microsoft SQL Server and Microsoft Access. In this article, I compare Microsoft SQL Server 2000 with Microsoft Access 2000 regarding hardware and software requirements, price, features and products limits.
SQL Server 2000 only works on Windows-based platforms, including Windows 9x, Windows NT, Windows 2000 and Windows CE.
Microsoft Access 2000 can be installed under the following operating systems: Microsoft Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows 98 Second Edition, Windows Millennium Edition (Windows Me), Windows NT 4.0 with Service Pack 6 (SP6), Windows 2000, or Windows XP or later.
To install SQL Server 2000, you should have the Intel or compatible platforms and the following hardware:
Microsoft Access 2000 is included in the Professional and Developer Editions of Microsoft Office 2000, but can be purchased separately also. If you install Access 2000 with other Office 2000 products, the hardware requirement can be increased in comparison with the single Access 2000 installation.
To install Microsoft Access 2000, you should have the following hardware:
SQL Server 2000 comes in six editions: Enterprise, Standard, Personal, Developer, Desktop Engine and SQL Server CE (a compatible version for Windows CE) and requires the following software:
In comparison with SQL Server 2000, Microsoft Access 2000 does not have any editions. Access 2000 can be installed under the following operation systems: Microsoft Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows 98 Second Edition, Windows Millennium Edition (Windows Me), Windows NT 4.0 with Service Pack 6 (SP6), Windows 2000, or Windows XP or later.
SQL Server 2000 is currently available under two licensing options:
The processor license requires a single license for each CPU in the computer running SQL Server 2000 and includes unlimited client access. You can buy this license when you do not know the number of the clients (for example, if your users will connect to SQL Server 2000 through the internet). This license usually is cheaper than Server/Per-Seat CAL when there are many users connected to SQL Server databases.
The Server/per-seat client access license (CAL) requires a license for the server and the licenses for each client device. You can use this licensing option when the customers do not need access beyond the firewall and the number of clients is low (for example, 10-20 users for SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition or 30-40 users for SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition).
Microsoft Access 2000 like Office 2000 is no longer available at retail for individual purchases. Microsoft Access 2002 and Office XP can be purchased now. The process of obtaining a previous version of a Microsoft product is called "downgrading." Downgrade rights apply to volume license customers only.
This is the current price for Microsoft Access 2002. Because Access 2002 is included in the Professional and Developer Editions of Microsoft Office XP, the prices of the Office XP Professional Edition and Office XP Developer Edition are also included.
Microsoft Access 2000 falls into the desktop category and works best for individuals and workgroups managing megabytes of data. In comparison with SQL Server 2000, Access uses file-server architecture, rather than client-server architecture. Access 2000 has many restrictions in comparison with SQL Server 2000 and cannot be used in the case where you want to build a stable and efficient system with many concurrent users.
Some SQL Server 2000 and Access 2000 restrictions:
SQL Server 2000 and Access 2000 limits
Some SQL Server 2000 and Access 2000 products limits:
If you need to make a scalability, security and robustness system, you should use SQL Server instead of Access. Because Access 2000 does not support atomic transactions, it does not guarantee that all changes performed within a transaction boundary are committed or rolled back. SQL Server is integrated with Windows NT security, but Access is not. Access 2000 databases cannot be restored to the point of failure, while SQL Server databases can be. This makes administering Access 2000 databases more expensive than administering SQL Server 2000 databases.
Therefore, you should use Access 2000 database, only when you need to store a small amount of data in a single user (or few users) environment, or when you have very low resources, such as memory or disk. In other cases, use MSDE or SQL Server.
1. SQL Server 2000 Books Online