Database Journal
MS SQL Oracle DB2 Access MySQL PostgreSQL Sybase PHP SQL Etc SQL Scripts & Samples Links Database Forum

» Database Journal Home
» Database Articles
» Database Tutorials
MS SQL
Oracle
DB2
MS Access
MySQL
» RESOURCES
Database Tools
SQL Scripts & Samples
Links
» Database Forum
» Sitemap
Free Newsletters:
DatabaseDaily  
News Via RSS Feed


follow us on Twitter
Database Journal |DBA Support |SQLCourse |SQLCourse2
 

Featured Database Articles

Oracle

Posted Oct 4, 2001

Features and Functions - Page 5

By DatabaseJournal.com Staff

A natural extension of the argument that you shouldn't necessarily strive for 'database independence' is the idea that you should understand exactly what your specific database has to offer and make full use of it. This is not a section on all of the features that Oracle 8i has to offer. That would be an extremely large book in itself. The new features of Oracle 8i themselves fill a book in the Oracle documentation set. With about 10,000 pages of documentation provided by Oracle, covering each and every feature and function would be quite an undertaking. Rather, this is a section on why it would benefit you to get at least a cursory knowledge of what is provided.

As I've said before, I answer questions about Oracle on the web. I'd say that 80 percent of my answers are simply URLs to the documentation. People are asking how they might go about writing some complex piece of functionality in the database (or outside of it). I just point them to the place in the documentation that tells them how Oracle has already implemented it, and how to use it. Replication comes up this way frequently. I'll receive the question 'I would like to keep a copy of my data elsewhere. I would like this to be a read-only copy. I need it to update only once a day at midnight. How can I write the code to do that?' The answer is as simple as a CREATE SNAPSHOT command. This is what built-in functionality in the database.

It is true you can write your own replication, it might even be fun to do so, but at the end of the day, it would not be the smartest thing to do. The database does a lot of stuff. In general, it can do it better then we can ourselves. Replication for example is internalized in the kernel, written in C. It's fast, it's fairly easy, and it is robust. It works across versions, across platforms. It is supported, so if you hit a problem, Oracle's support team will be glad to help. If you upgrade, replication will be supported there as well, probably with some new features. Now, consider if you had developed your own. You would have to provide support for all of the versions you wanted to support. Inter-operability between 7.3 and 8.0 and 8.1 and 9.0, and so on — this would be your job. If it 'broke', you won't be calling support. At least, not until you can get a test case that is small enough to demonstrate your basic issue. When the new release of Oracle comes out, it will be up to you to migrate your replication code to that release.

Not having a full understanding of what is available to you can come back to haunt you in the long run. I was recently talking with some developers and their management. They were demonstrating a 'very cool' piece of software they had developed. It was a message-based system that solved the database queue problem. You see this normally in a database if you wanted many people to use a table as a 'queue'. You would like many people to be able to lock the next record in the queue, skipping over any previously locked records (these queue records are being processed already). The problem you encounter is that there is no documented syntax in the database for skipping locked rows. So, if you didn't know anything about Oracle's features, you would assume that if you wanted queuing software on top of the database, you would have to build it (or buy it).

That is what these developers did. They built a series of processes, and developed APIs for doing message queuing on top of the database. They spent quite a bit of time on it, and used quite a few man-hours to achieve it. The developers were quite sure it was unique. Immediately after seeing it, and hearing of its functionality, I had one thing to say — Advanced Queues. This is a native feature of the database. It solves the 'get the first unlocked record in the queue table and lock it for me' problem. It was right there all along. Their developers, not knowing that this feature existed, spent a lot of time and energy writing their own. In addition to spending lots of time in the past on it, they would be spending lots of time maintaining it in the future. Their manager was less than impressed upon discovering the unique piece of software in effect emulated a native database feature.

I have seen people in an Oracle 8i database set up daemon processes that reads messages off of pipes (a database IPC mechanism). These daemon processes execute the SQL contained within the pipe message, and commit the work. They did this so that they could execute auditing in a transaction that would not get rolled back if the bigger transaction did. Usually, if a trigger or something were used to audit an access to some data, but a statement failed later on, all of the work would be rolled back (see Chapter 4 on Transactions, we discuss this statement level atomicity in some detail). So, by sending a message to another process, they could have a separate transaction do the work and commit it. The audit record would stay around, even if the parent transaction rolled back. In versions of Oracle before Oracle 8I, this was an appropriate (and pretty much the only) way to implement this functionality. When I told them of the database feature called autonomous transactions (we will take a detailed look at these in Chapter 15), they were quite upset with themselves. Autonomous transactions, implemented with a single line of code, do exactly what they were doing. On the bright side, this meant they could discard a lot of code and not have to maintain it. In addition, the system ran faster overall, and was easier to understand. Still, they were upset at the amount of time they had wasted reinventing the wheel. In particular the developer who wrote the daemon processes was quite upset at having just written a bunch of 'shelf-ware'.

The above list of examples is something I see repeated time, and time again — large complex solutions to problems that are already solved by the database itself. Unless you take the time to learn what is available, you are doomed to do the same thing at some point. In the second section of this book, Database Structures and Utilities, we are going to take an in-depth look at a handful of functionality provided by the database. I picked and chose the features and functions that I see people using frequently, or in other cases, functionality that should be used more often but is not. It is only the tip of the iceberg however. There is so much more to Oracle than can be presented in a single book.



Oracle Archives

Comment and Contribute

 


(Maximum characters: 1200). You have characters left.

 

 




Latest Forum Threads
Oracle Forum
Topic By Replies Updated
Oracle Data Mining: Classification jan.hasller 0 July 5th, 07:19 AM
Find duplicates - Unique IDs Lava 5 July 2nd, 08:30 AM
no matching unique or primary key rcanter 1 April 25th, 12:32 PM
Update values of one table based on condition of values in other table using Trigger Gladiator 3 February 29th, 06:01 PM


















Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date