Oracle's DBMS_PROFILER: PL/SQL Performance Tuning - Page 2April 28, 2003 EXAMPLE on using DBMS_PROFILER 1. Creating my procedure.
E.g.:
create or replace procedure am_perf_chk (pi_seq in number,
pio_status in out nocopy varchar2) is
l_dat date := sysdate;
begin
if trunc(l_dat) = '21-sep-02' and pi_seq = 1 then
pio_status := 'OK';
else
pio_status := 'Invalid tape loaded';
end if;
exception
when others then
pio_status := 'Error in am_perf_chek';
end;
2. Calling the routine with profiler. SQL> @d:\am\call_profiler.sql Profiler started Invalid tape loaded PL/SQL procedure successfully completed. Profiler stopped Profiler flushed runid:8 3. Evaluating the execution time.
SQL> @d:\am\evaluate_profiler_results.sql
Enter value for runid: 8
Enter value for name: am_perf_chk
Enter value for owner: scott
Line Occur Msec Text
---------- ---------- ---------- -------------------------------------------------------------------
1 procedure am_perf_chk (pi_seq in number,
2 pio_status in out nocopy varchar2) is
3 2 43.05965 l_dat date := sysdate;
4 begin
5 1 86.35732 if trunc(l_dat) = '21-sep-02' and pi_seq = 1 then
6 0 0 pio_status := 'OK';
7 else
8 1 8.416151 pio_status := 'Invalid tape loaded';
9 end if;
10 exception
11 when others then
12 0 0 pio_status := 'Error in am_perf_chek';!
13 1 2.410361 end;
13 rows selected.
Code% coverage
--------------
66.6666667
As you can see, line 3 shows execution time as 86 msec which can be improved on. The if statement is altered (if pi_seq = 1 and trunc(l_dat) = '21-sep-02' then) and the above process is repeated. The following is the new result:
Line Occur Msec Text
---------- ---------- ---------- -------------------------------------------------------------------
1 procedure am_perf_chk (pi_seq in number,
2 pio_status in out nocopy varchar2) is
3 2 17.978816 l_dat date := sysdate;
4 begin
5 1 8.419503 if pi_seq = 1 and trunc(l_dat) = '21-sep-02' then
6 0 0 pio_status := 'OK';
7 else
8 1 7.512684 pio_status := 'Invalid tape loaded';
9 end if;
10 exception
11 when others then
12 0 0 pio_status := 'Error in !am_perf_chek';
13 1 .731657 end;
13 rows selected.
Code% coverage
--------------
66.6666667
As you can see, line 3 execution time is
reduced from 86 msec to 8 msec for the tested scenario. The excess time was
taken due to the trunc() built-in. Shifting this to the right prevents its
execution if the first condition is false. This is a small example and you will
be thrown more challenges when debugging bigger routines. |