Rolling Back Layers of Automatic Undo Management
May 10, 2006
Probably the number one database administration headache in pre-9i versions of Oracle concerns the "ORA-01555 snapshot too old" error. Let's move forward to Oracle 10g and configure a database to use automatic undo management (AUM). Your initialization file (pfile or spfile) has the appropriate settings to use AUM. Life is good until one day (perhaps sooner than later) when you or a user receives an ORA-01555 error. How can that be? Wasn't that the main point or advantage behind using AUM in the first place: no more rollback segment-related errors?
I know how to fix the rollback segment size issue, you say, recalling how the error could be circumvented in the olden days. Just issue a "set transaction use rollback segment real_big" statement. In 10g, here is what the statement and result looks like:
Problem fixed, right? Well, no, not really. If you are using 10g in AUM mode, try either the command shown above or even this one: set transaction use rollback segment make_believe.
Why you can still receive ORA-01555 errors
The reason you can still experience this error is that your undo retention parameter value is not high enough. One solution is to set a higher value. However, having read something about new features in 10g, something that may stand out is how 10g can automatically tune the retention period. Are you supposed to set a retention period value or not? Shown below is Oracle's recommendation (Database Concepts):
What are the rules to set, or not to set - regarding the setting of UNDO_RETENTION? You must set the undo retention parameter when:
Retention guarantee is a feature found in Oracle 10g Release 2. If you use the "RETENTION GUARANTEE" clause in a "create undo tablespace" statement (either during database creation or afterwards), or use it within an "alter tablespace" statement, you are telling Oracle to guarantee that whatever retention period you have set will be honored. This is especially useful for flashback operations, but the potential risk is that future DML statements may fail because their generation of undo data will cut into the space needed by Oracle to guarantee your unexpired data stays that way.
Related to the setting of this value is the size you set (or not) for your undo tablespace(s). Enabling automatic extension (AUTOEXTEND ON) allows Oracle to allocate enough disk space to guarantee the specified retention period. You do run the risk, however, of a "runaway query" consuming significant amounts of space.
How do you know if your undo tablespace has guaranteed retention set?
SQL> select tablespace_name, retention 2 from dba_tablespaces; TABLESPACE_NAME RETENTION ------------------------------ ---------- SYSTEM NOT APPLY UNDOTBS1 GUARANTEE SYSAUX NOT APPLY TEMP NOT APPLY USERS NOT APPLY
Seeing "NOT APPLY" is an excellent sign that a tablespace is not an undo tablespace because only "GUARANTEE" and "NOGUARANTEE" are applicable to undo tablespaces. As a tip, in the event you are taking over a new database and have to find out which tablespaces are undo or not (although there are other more direct ways, such as querying tablespace names in DBA_UNDO_EXTENTS), the query above will come in handy.
What about setting a rollback segment for a transaction?
If you set a transaction to use a rollback segment named "make_believe," how could that have worked if you never even created or named a segment like that in the first place? That is a bug or "feature" in Release 2. The only "real" rollback segments are related to the data dictionary (and you have no direct control over them anyway), and if in AUM mode, rollback segments are about as useful as a screen door on a submarine. If (and why?) you are still using rollback segments in 10g and want to convert to AUM, a manually run PL/SQL block based off of the undo advisor can be used to help set an initial size or value of AUM settings.
set serveroutput on DECLARE utbsiz_in_MB NUMBER; BEGIN utbsiz_in_MB := DBMS_UNDO_ADV.RBU_MIGRATION; end; /
Automatic Undo Management by itself is not new, but there are several significant enhancements (i.e., differences) between 10g Release 1 and Release 2. I have seen the look of surprise on someone's face (myself included) when the ORA-01555 error appears when using 10g, and the first words or reaction is, "How is that even possible when I'm not using rollback segments?" The truth of the matter is that it can and does happen, perhaps with regularity in some environments. Understanding how (and when) certain AUM settings affect recovery is important because not having the correct settings or values may lull you into a false sense of security. You may think you can flashback 24 hours, and then be in for a rude surprise when all you really have is 15 minutes.
Aside from several (and quite good) recently released books on Oracle 10g, to include Expert Oracle Database 10g Administration by Sam Alapati, articles at OTN are always a good reference or starting point to learn more about AUM.