Oracle has given us a new parameter STATISTICS_LEVEL for
collecting database statistics. Lets take a deeper look at what you can expect
from your database system when this parameter is set and statistics are being
No, turning on statistics is not required. Although, ever
since I have been working with Oracle databases, I have on only one occasion
remembered when Oracle has not recommended turning on at least timed_statistics.
If you recall it was back in the version 8.1.6 days when there was a problem
and everyone scrambled to get on the "stable" 8.1.7 version. Today, the only
parameter that I have found, related to statistical collections, that Oracle
does not recommend keeping continually turned on is the timed_os_statistics.
There is a lot of stigmatism and folklore going around about
turning on statistical collections. When doing a quick look through
documentation, websites, newsgroups, and asking my local Oracle professionals,
I came up with the following responses to statistical collection.
- You must set
TIMED_STATISTICS to TRUE in the parameter file.
- I recommend
using timed statistics.
- Doing this
will have a small negative effect on system performance.
- You will incur
minimal resource overhead
- You cannot
afford to be without the information that timed statistics provides.
I don't know about you but these tend to leave me very
uneasy and stressed when reading these comments. They range of feelings I have
are from 'YOU MUST' to 'YOU SHOULD NOT'. Personally, I tend to get very uneasy
when I am told what to do and what not to do, especially when there aren't any
benchmarks to support the statements.
Not only does Oracle themselves not have any benchmarks on
what system overhead is incurred when collecting statistics, at least that they
want to share, but I have been unable to find any in the Oracle community.
Here are the typical responses I have gotten when asked about benchmarks.
- Sorry, Oracle
Support does not have any specific benchmark information.
___________, they may have benchmark information.
- Can anyone
else share their input and experiences.
- My Technical
Consultant has not seen any specific benchmarks on this.
- Take a look at
the guide and if necessary we will try to get some development resources
In order to reduce the stress I have generated and validate
for myself the system impact of statistical collection, I set out to run three
simple tests and compare my results. As you recall, the parameter
STATISTICS_LEVEL has three settings: BASIC, TYPICAL, and ALL. What I wanted to
do was set my STATISTICS_LEVEL to each of these three settings and run the same
workload through. As you might also remember, setting STATISTICS_LEVEL to BASIC
does no collection so I had to hardwire timed_statistics equal to TRUE in my
SPFILE. In figure 1, you can see what statistics and advisories where turned on
during each of the three test scenarios. My system simulated an OLTP
environment. In addition, I did not want contention to play a big impact so I
reduced the transactions to a point where I knew that they would have plenty of
resources available to them. This was done so that I could safely say that a
reduction of workload and throughput was not caused by contention, but in fact,
was caused by the statistic levels I was testing for.
A Little Background
Let's get a quick level set on what it is I really was
concerned with monitoring and comparing, with the three test scenarios. In
figure 2, you will see a typical, yet basic database system. At the front of
the time slice, users or jobs request work from the database system. This is
called the workload. As the workload goes through the system it incurs database
resources (v$sysstat) and wait times (v$system_event). The accumulation of
resource usage and wait times in the database correlates to database response
time. Other factors that contribute to the total throughput of user requests are
basically just "other" things that humans do during a normal workday. These
range from getting coffee to figuring out what the next transaction looks like.